There’re still many aspects that need to be improved in the teaching of English reading. Some teachers put more emphasis on the language points and the grammar analysis. They spend much time on explaining the language knowledge. With time passing by, students become less interested in the reading. As a result, their reading ability is little improved. According to schema theory, we may carry out some reading abilities to activate interest, and we should provide more background knowledge to help students understand the reading materials better.

From the above analysis, we can see that schema theory is helpful to the teaching of English reading.

2. Literature Review

Schema was first put forward by Kant in 1781.He believes that concept doesn’t carry meaning by itself; and it is meaningful just when it is related with something already known by people. Psychologist E.C Barlett (1932) defines schema as the active organization of former experience and reaction.

Anderson and Pearson (1984) stated that a schema is an abstract knowledge structure which the reader brings to the text while reading. It is abstract in the sense that it summarizes what is known about many cases that differ in many situations. And it is structured in the sense that it represents the relationship among its component parts. The significant assumption of the theory is that a text doesn’t have any meanings. Rather, it only provides directions for readers as for how they should reconstruct meaning from their prior knowledge, i.e., background knowledge, which is the general knowledge of the world stored in one’s mind. According to the model, comprehension is an interactive process between a read’s background knowledge and the text, and between new knowledge and old knowledge store.

Schemata are hierarchically organized form the most general at the top to the most specific at the bottom. Celce-Murcia (2000) pides the reading process into four stages: (1) clues to meanings are taken up from the page and transmitted to the brain; (2) the brain then tries to match existing knowledge to the incoming data to facilitate the information; (3) predictions are made about the content of the passage based on the existing experience; (4) the data is examined more closely and predictions are either confirmed or revised. The principle above results in two basic models of information processing: bottom-up processing and top-down processing. As to the former one, readers analyze each word for its meaning or grammatical characteristics and then accumulate meaning to form preposition. The top-down processing takes place when the system makes general predictions based on higher level, general schemata, and then searches the input for information to fit into these partially satisfied higher level schemata.

上一篇:外语学习者在书面语中逻辑连接词的误用
下一篇:跨文化视角下英汉语中恭维语及其应答比较

朝鲜语论文中韩与龙有关的俗语比较研究

也门与中国贸易平衡及首选产品评价

功能对等理论下魔幻小说...

美国梦的幻灭与《推销员之死》中人性的背叛

论《一个人的朝圣》有关爱的失去与回归

理性与非理性简爱和伯莎梅森反抗的对比分析

从关联理论角度分析商品广告中隐喻的应用

稀土伴生放射性冶炼厂环境放射性水平调查

沉箱码头设计国内外研究现状和参考文献

中学地理生活化教学研究

18岁可以學什么技术,18岁...

结肠透析机治疗慢性肾功...

浅谈芭蕾舞外开与中国古典舞外旋的区别

论好莱坞电影中的中国文化元素

社会工作视野下医患关系的冲突与协调

原位离子交换法合成AgBrAg3PO4复合光催化材料

谈人机工程学在公共电话亭设计中的应用